IFSCA Grade A Exam Analysis 2025, 11 October Phase 1 Exam Review

The IFSC Grade A Phase 1 Exam 2025 has concluded, and based on the initial reactions and feedback from students and faculty, the overall difficulty level of the exam can be categorized as moderate. In this detailed analysis, we break down each section, providing insights on difficulty, important topics, and expected attempts to help students evaluate their performance.

IFSCA Grade A Exam Analysis 2025, 11 October

In the IFSCA Grade A Paper 1, which included Quantitative Aptitude, Reasoning, English, General Awareness, and Current Affairs, was generally doable, with students able to secure the cutoff marks with focused attempts. Paper 2, General Stream covering Economics, Finance, Management, and Costing & Accounts, ranged from moderate to slightly tough in some sections, but selective attempts on easy-to-moderate questions could help achieve the overall cutoff.

IFSCA Grade A Exam Analysis 2025 Good Attempts

The IFSC Grade A Exam 2025 Phase 1 has concluded and was moderate in overall difficulty. Paper 1 was largely doable for students with consistent practice in Quantitative Aptitude, English, and Current Affairs, while managing time for some of the lengthy reasoning questions was crucial.

Paper 2 ranged from moderate to difficult, with conceptual depth and familiarity with previous exam trends especially in Economics and Finance making the attempt easier for prepared students.

IFSCA Grade A Exam Analysis 2025, Subject Wise Exam Analysis 2025

The IFSC Grade A Phase 1 Exam consisted of two papers covering Quantitative Aptitude, Reasoning, English, Current Affairs, and subject-specific areas like Economics, Finance, Management, Costing, and Accounts. Based on student feedback, the overall exam was manageable for well-prepared candidates, though some sections were more challenging than others.

IFSCA Grade A Paper 1

Paper 1 is designed to evaluate basic aptitude, reasoning, English proficiency, and current affairs awareness. The questions are mostly moderate in difficulty, with a few sections leaning towards the easier side, rewarding regular practice and conceptual clarity.

Quantitative Aptitude

• Focused on number series, missing numbers, simple interest, partnership, averages, and income/expenditure problems.
• Most questions were moderate and required strong basics and calculation speed.
• Strategic selection was key as almost all topics followed common patterns seen in practice tests.

Reasoning Ability

• Featured sitting arrangement and complex puzzles, questions on inequalities, and analytical reasoning.
• The section felt lengthy; strong time management was essential.
• Good attempts were possible with consistent practice of advanced problem sets.

English Language

• Included reading comprehension, vocabulary-based fill-in-the-blanks, and double fillers.
• RC based on moderate passages, with vocabulary playing a key role in scoring well.
• Candidates with strong reading habits and vocabulary found this section manageable.

General Awareness (Current Affairs)

• Mostly one-liners covering three months’ current affairs, especially finance/regulatory headlines (NBFCs, G20, major reports).
• Few, if any, questions on static awareness; focus was on the latest news.
• Students who revised regular current affairs scored well.

IFSCA Grade A Paper 2

Paper 2 delves deeper into specialized subjects related to finance, economics, management, costing, and accounts. This paper balanced moderate and tough sections, demanding deeper understanding and applied knowledge.

Economics

• Questions included concepts like the LM curve, market demand, investment multiplier, and national income.
• Repeated themes from previous years (e.g., sustainable development goals), emphasizing PYQ (previous year question) importance.
• A mix of conceptual and straight factual questions, with moderate overall difficulty.

Finance

• Featured oneliner questions on practical finance, including NPCI, IMPS, Inclusion Index, derivatives, risk management, and monetary policy tools.
• Easier than economics with mostly direct concepts and clear definitions.
• Regular review of key finance topics and definitions was helpful.

Management

• Covered motivation theories, leadership styles, HRD, planning, corporate governance, and ERP.
• Questions included longer statements or slightly tweaked options, making some items confusing.
• Often required differentiating between closely related management principles and practices.

Costing and Accounts

• Leaned towards moderate to tough, testing candidates on capital gearing ratio, proprietary ratio, business process reengineering (BPR), and essential accounting calculations.
• Included some calculation-based as well as theory-based items (e.g., full forms like DMAIC).
• Required conceptual clarity and familiarity with less common accounting/finance terms.